Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
BEC STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : BEC STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: IRR (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
venchlu
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 587
Posted: 05 Jan 2010 at 14:55 | IP Logged  

 Does the internal rate of return method take into account recognition of the project's salvage value?? Please help me out.

My answer to it is yes, it does . But Wiley CD said NO. I am confused! What u guys think??

Back to Top View venchlu's Profile Search for other posts by venchlu
 
Xalina
Regular
Regular


Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Posted: 20 Feb 2010 at 12:53 | IP Logged  

IRR uses payback method which ignores the salvage value. This is the only explanation I can think of. Is there a better reasoning? 

__________________
Becker all the way!
FAR- 10/09/09-88
AUD- 11/24/09-91
REG- 01/22/2010- 94
BEC- 03/01/2010-90
I came, I saw, I calculated!
Back to Top View Xalina's Profile Search for other posts by Xalina
 
mits07
Regular
Regular


Joined: 22 Jan 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 115
Posted: 20 Feb 2010 at 14:58 | IP Logged  

IRR uses Payback Period using Present Value Factor.  IRR does take into consideration of Salvage Value.  NPV and Discounted Cash Flow also uses salvage value.  Only, Payback period ignores Salvage Value.  
Back to Top View mits07's Profile Search for other posts by mits07
 
EAK5455
Regular
Regular


Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 107
Posted: 20 Feb 2010 at 21:07 | IP Logged  

If the salvage value reduces the initial investment outlay, then the salvage value will be considered and will affect the paypback period. If
the salvage value is the terminal value of the project then it is not considered in that it does not reduce the annual cash flow nor the
initial investment outlay.

In other words, if you're considering a project investment where a machine will be replaced, then the salvage value of the old machine will
offset against the cost of the initial investment outlay and thus will reduce the payback period.

If you're considering a project investment where a machine has a terminal value (salvage value at the end of the project investment), then
this salvage value will be ignored for purposes of the payback period.

The underlying premise behind the payback period is in answer the question "how long will it take to recover the money I am currently having
to shell out for this project".

The IRR method considers both salvage value of replaced property and terminal value of proposed property discounted to current value.

__________________
REG-01/26/10- 96
BEC-02/25/10- 83
AUD-5/30/10- 82
FAR-08/02/10-91
Kansas board

Ethics 100%
Back to Top View EAK5455's Profile Search for other posts by EAK5455
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote