Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: For Becker users - re: consolidations (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
wannabe
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 21 Jun 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 522
Posted: 07 Feb 2009 at 15:03 | IP Logged  

I wonder if Becker makes a distinction between downstream and upstream sales. Downstream when Parent sales to Sub and Downstream when Sub sells to Parent. Does Becker material mention and takes into account this or not? Thanks a lot!

 



__________________
CPA exam - done
Back to Top View wannabe's Profile Search for other posts by wannabe
 
terpfan101
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Posted: 07 Feb 2009 at 16:10 | IP Logged  

I remember learning about that in advanced accounting. They didn't use those terms in Becker, but do mention a distinction between who the seller is.
Back to Top View terpfan101's Profile Search for other posts by terpfan101
 
wannabe
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 21 Jun 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 522
Posted: 07 Feb 2009 at 17:31 | IP Logged  

thanks terpfan101.

Hmm. My question now is

For example if Parent sold Sub land for a gain of 25,000 in 2007. Elimination JE would be @ Dec 2007

Original entry

cash 125,000

    land 100,000

    Gain 25,000

Elimiantion entry

Gain 25,000

    land 25,000

The elimination JE FOR 2008. Parent still holds land so gain has to be eliminated

Investment in Sub 25,000

   Land 25,000

The entry if Sub sold to Parent would have been

RE   25,000

    Land 25,000

Sorry for the long explanation. Does Becker makes this type of distinction? or should I just forget about the differences of Parent selling to Sub and Sub to Parent. Thanks a bunch!

 



__________________
CPA exam - done
Back to Top View wannabe's Profile Search for other posts by wannabe
 
terpfan101
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Posted: 07 Feb 2009 at 18:35 | IP Logged  

that seems correct from what I remember from advanced. Again, though Becker's examples all have been (at least as I can remember) P sells to S. Maybe somebody else could chime in as to whether they've seen it the other way on the exam. 
Back to Top View terpfan101's Profile Search for other posts by terpfan101
 
wannabe
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 21 Jun 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 522
Posted: 07 Feb 2009 at 19:40 | IP Logged  

Thanks a lot, terpfan. If you don't remember maybe Becker doesn't really go into this type of details...



__________________
CPA exam - done
Back to Top View wannabe's Profile Search for other posts by wannabe
 




Page of 3 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1250 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote