Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Interim Reporting (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
cpa_ca
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 40
Posted: 21 Mar 2009 at 15:15 | IP Logged  

Can any one explain the answer for this one?

Due to a decline in market price in the second quarter,
Petal Co. incurred an inventory loss. The market price
is expected to return to previous levels by the end of
the year. At the end of the year the decline had not
reversed. When should the loss be reported in Petal's
interim income statements?

a. Ratably over the second, third, and forth [sic]
quarters.
b. Ratably over the third and fourth quarters.
c. In the second quarter only.
d. In the fourth quarter only.

Choice "d" is correct. When the loss is probable and
estimable, the expected loss must be recorded in full.
This loss becomes such at the end of the fourth quarter.
Therefore, the inventory must be valued on the year-end
at the lower of cost or market, recognizing the loss at
that time.

My question: why not recognize in 2nd quarter since the
loss has already occurred then?

Thanks a lot!
Back to Top View cpa_ca's Profile Search for other posts by cpa_ca
 
divyagovil1
Major Contributor
Major Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1456
Posted: 21 Mar 2009 at 17:17 | IP Logged  

In Interim reporting, temporary market declines that are expected to reverse before the end of the annual period should not be recognized in interim period statements.

In the second quarter, loss was not probable as It was expected to return to previous levels by year end.

In this case, loss became probable only in fourth quarter as the decline had not reversed. Thus, loss would be recognized in fourth quarter !

 



__________________
Divya - CO State

Passed using Becker Review :
FAR - 04/11/09 - 94
BEC - 05/30/09 - 86
REG - 08/29/09 - 95
AUD - 11/21/09 - 92
Ethics - 2011
Back to Top View divyagovil1's Profile Search for other posts by divyagovil1 Visit divyagovil1's Homepage
 
cpa_ca
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 40
Posted: 21 Mar 2009 at 20:30 | IP Logged  

Thank you very much! Your answer could not be more
clear.
Back to Top View cpa_ca's Profile Search for other posts by cpa_ca
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote