Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: LEASES (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
ssham1976
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 350
Posted: 21 Jun 2009 at 20:46 | IP Logged  

On January 1, Year One, AnnaLee Company buys a warehouse for $800,000 and is in the process of leasing it to Ziton Company for four out of its five year life. AnnaLee normally has an implicit rate of 10 percent whereas Ziton has an incremental borrowing rate of 8 percent. Assume the payment amounts have been computed appropriately. For these computations assume that the present value of $1 in four years at 8 percent annual interest is .72 and at 10 percent is .66. Assume that the present value of an ordinary annuity of $1 for four years at 8 percent annual interest is 3.27 and at 10 percent is 3.10. Assume that the present value of annuity due of $1 for four years at 8 percent annual interest is 3.55 and at 10 percent is 3.46. Payments are set to be $210,000 per year with the payments to begin immediately. The lessee has an option to buy the asset at the end of the lease for $70,000 which is viewed as a bargain. It is a direct financing lease. What is the total increase in net income that AnnaLee will report in Year One?

 

ANSWER IS A - ANY EXPLANATION

< =/exams.cfm?name=question&test_id=238342 method=post> <>
 
< id=answer-20387 = value=20387 name=answer>
< id=answer-20388 = value=20388 name=answer>
< id=answer-20389 = value=20389 name=answer>
Back to Top View ssham1976's Profile Search for other posts by ssham1976
 
Aries1
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 83
Posted: 24 Jun 2009 at 11:54 | IP Logged  

as I am working on this question ,some number doesnot seem right.

first, if you notice the cost is more than the sale price.even if we subtract the pv of unguaranteed residual (70,000) still we have a loss on the sale.

so i dont see any increase in net income for the lessor

and since the cost is not equal to the fv this has to be a "sale type lease"

if you found an explanation plz share it with us.

Thanks

--------------

far july 6th 2009

Back to Top View Aries1's Profile Search for other posts by Aries1
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote