Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: government accounting (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
aatiyakakar
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Posted: 17 Sep 2009 at 20:07 | IP Logged  

this question is unclear as far as dates are concerned.
Is that a confusion only with me or someone else also??
Kindly    solve and let me know.

The following information pertains to property taxes
levied by Oak City for the calendar year 1992:

Collections during 1992     $500,000
Expected collections during the first 60 days of 1993     
100,000
Expected collections during the balance of 1993     60,000
Expected collections during January 1994     30,000
Estimated to be uncollectible         ;     10,000
Total levy     $700,000

What amount should Oak report for 1992 net property tax
revenues in its fund financial statements
Back to Top View aatiyakakar's Profile Search for other posts by aatiyakakar
 
bryris
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 624
Posted: 17 Sep 2009 at 22:44 | IP Logged  

690,000.

Am I right?



__________________
REG - 97
FAR - 97
BEC - 90
AUD - 97
Back to Top View bryris's Profile Search for other posts by bryris Visit bryris's Homepage
 
Xalina
Regular
Regular


Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Posted: 23 Sep 2009 at 18:54 | IP Logged  

Because its derived tax, revenue is recognized when measurable and available. The answer is 600 K, 500 K collected during the year and 100k Collectible within 60 days of financial year end.

__________________
Becker all the way!
FAR- 10/09/09-88
AUD- 11/24/09-91
REG- 01/22/2010- 94
BEC- 03/01/2010-90
I came, I saw, I calculated!
Back to Top View Xalina's Profile Search for other posts by Xalina
 
Megan
Regular
Regular


Joined: 29 May 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 115
Posted: 23 Sep 2009 at 19:46 | IP Logged  

Xalina wrote:
Because its derived tax, revenue is recognized when measurable and available. The answer is 600 K, 500 K collected during the year and 100k Collectible within 60 days of financial year end.

Why would you not subtract the 10,000 from 600K? 

Back to Top View Megan's Profile Search for other posts by Megan
 
Xalina
Regular
Regular


Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Posted: 24 Sep 2009 at 21:54 | IP Logged  

Estimated uncollected taxes would enter into the revenue calculation only at the beginning of the period as you are making an estimate as to how much will be collected. This question is after the phase as you will start the calculation with the actual collection made, thus there is no reason the take the net receivable as you are using actual amounts.


__________________
Becker all the way!
FAR- 10/09/09-88
AUD- 11/24/09-91
REG- 01/22/2010- 94
BEC- 03/01/2010-90
I came, I saw, I calculated!
Back to Top View Xalina's Profile Search for other posts by Xalina
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote