Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Capital project funds (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
venchlu
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 587
Posted: 03 May 2010 at 16:06 | IP Logged  

A capital projects fund for a new city courthouse recorded a receivable of $300,000 for a state grant and a $450,000 transfer from the general fund. WHat amount should be reported as revenue by the capital proejects fund?

A.$0

B.$300,000

C. $450,000

D. $750,000

I chose A..but the answer is B. I know $450,000 is other financing sourse. But how about state grant of $300,000...i thought we don't consider revenue till we actually spent it....? Am i wrong here? THanks! ( governmental accouinting is driving my nuts )



__________________
REG 91
BEC 89
AUD 88
MA certified
FAR 94
Back to Top View venchlu's Profile Search for other posts by venchlu
 
conquercpa
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 09 Apr 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Posted: 03 May 2010 at 17:11 | IP Logged  

The answer is B.

Capital project funds is a type of govermental funds. You recognize revenue when it is measurable and available (collectable in 60 days). So the $300,000 state grant should be recorded as revenue. Don't know how you got the idea that you don't record revenue till you actually spent it. you are right about the $450,000 as other financing source.



__________________
Where there is a will, there is a way...
Back to Top View conquercpa's Profile Search for other posts by conquercpa
 
nkocpa
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Posted: 03 May 2010 at 20:16 | IP Logged  

venchlu wrote:

A capital projects fund for a new city courthouse recorded a receivable of $300,000 for a state grant and a $450,000 transfer from the general fund. WHat amount should be reported as revenue by the capital proejects fund?

A.$0

B.$300,000

C. $450,000

D. $750,000

I chose A..but the answer is B. I know $450,000 is other financing sourse. But how about state grant of $300,000...i thought we don't consider revenue till we actually spent it....? Am i wrong here? THanks! ( governmental accouinting is driving my nuts )

In a way I agree with you. This type of revenue falls under the class of Govt-mandated non-exchange transactions and voluntary non-exchange transactions. For these, the Govt. recognizes the revenue when all eligibilty requirments have been met. In the problem there were no eligibility rules specified for the grant.

Back to Top View nkocpa's Profile Search for other posts by nkocpa
 
conquercpa
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 09 Apr 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Posted: 03 May 2010 at 22:28 | IP Logged  

nkocpa, I looked it up on the becker Explanation. It says "The state grant would be reported as revenue in the capital projects fund, and the transfer from the general fund would not. (should be "other financing source" not revenue). The receivable associated with this capital project assumes revenues have been earned by either incurring eligible capital outlay expenditures or by satisfaction of other pertinent grant requirements prior to accuring the receivable. "

So I think the question is not asking you to determine the eligibilty requirements for the grant, instead, it assumes it has already met. It is testing which amount should be recorded as revenue, which one is for "other financing source".



__________________
Where there is a will, there is a way...
Back to Top View conquercpa's Profile Search for other posts by conquercpa
 
nkocpa
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Posted: 04 May 2010 at 01:38 | IP Logged  

Yes that is what I meant. There were no eligibility rules mentioned hence the revenue should be recognized immediately and answer = B.

I was just commenting on the fact that if eligibility rules had been mentioned, then the timing of the revenue would have ben different.

I was agreeing to Venchui's explanation but not his answer. Thanks.

 

 

Back to Top View nkocpa's Profile Search for other posts by nkocpa
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1104 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote