Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: MCQ: Consolidation through Acquisition (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
phung80219
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 01 May 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 93
Posted: 16 May 2010 at 16:04 | IP Logged  

Is there some sort of reasoning behind the answer being D or is it just one of those things you have to just memorize?

PDX Corp. acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of Sea Corp. in an acquisition transaction. The cost of the acquisition exceeded the fair value of the
identifiable assets and assumed liabilities. The general guidelines for assigning amounts to the inventories acquired provide for:

a.   Raw materials to be valued at original cost.
b.   Work in process to be valued at the estimated selling prices of finished goods, less both costs to complete and costs of disposal.
c.   Finished goods to be valued at replacement cost.
d.   Finished goods to be valued at estimated selling prices, less both costs of disposal and a reasonable profit allowance.

__________________
-Phung
-REG 11/17/2009 Passed
-FAR 07/13/2010 Passed
-AUD 10/04/2010
-BEC 11/30/2010
Back to Top View phung80219's Profile Search for other posts by phung80219
 
OrDieTryng!
Regular
Regular


Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 130
Posted: 16 May 2010 at 17:51 | IP Logged  

LOL, I remember that question! I don't recall any specific mention of it in
Becker (or anywhere else). I guess that's one you just try to tuck into the
wrinkles of your brain and hope it sticks.

I wish they did a better job of explaining answers. If I know the logic or
reasoning behind, I usually don't have to bother with sitting there trying to
memorize it by repeating it 100 times. Unfortunately, Becker doesn't do a
good job in this area.

Maybe someone else can give you the logic. What did Becker say?

__________________
FAR: 84 Becker
REG: 95 Becker
BEC: 88 Becker
AUD: 88 Gleim
Back to Top View OrDieTryng!'s Profile Search for other posts by OrDieTryng!
 
CharliePetApple
Regular
Regular


Joined: 30 Oct 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 173
Posted: 16 May 2010 at 18:12 | IP Logged  

 fair value has to be assigned. Saying that look for a guideline that defines the "fair value" best

I don't know, though, if I would choose D if you did not tell the answer, but answer A is easy to eliminate. B doesn't sounds right either: sales price minus cost to complete aproximates fair value, but not really is the fair value

 



__________________
BEC - PASS 11/17/09 Wiley 2008
AUD - PASS 02/25/10 Wiley 2008
REG - PASS 03/23/10 Wiley 2010
FAR - PASS 06/22/10 Wiley 2010
There is no failure except in no longer trying
Back to Top View CharliePetApple's Profile Search for other posts by CharliePetApple
 



Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.


  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote