Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Property Dividends (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
CPASTONE
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 95
Posted: 21 Jul 2010 at 03:50 | IP Logged  

Property dividends require assets to restated as fair value and becker has suggested following JE assuming

Building is distributed as dividend.
Cost 70, Accumulated depreciation 20
FV 100

Dr.Retained Earnings 100
Dr.Accumulated Depreciation 20
Cr.Building 70
Cr.Gain on Appreciation 50

Is it possible to break this composite entry by including dividend payable account?

If yes pls tell me how? Thanks so much


__________________
CPASTONE
FAR- 7/30/10 -pass
Audit-05/26/10 -pass
Reg-05/21/10- pass
Bec-08/31/10-pass
Back to Top View CPASTONE's Profile Search for other posts by CPASTONE
 
Tajik4CPA
Regular
Regular


Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 238
Posted: 21 Jul 2010 at 09:30 | IP Logged  

Probably not since no cash is involved.

__________________
FAR - 92
AUD - 82
REG - 83
BEC - 90

Becker 2009 and Gleim 2010, Wiley 13.0
Back to Top View Tajik4CPA's Profile Search for other posts by Tajik4CPA
 
amu7
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 22 May 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 392
Posted: 21 Jul 2010 at 10:05 | IP Logged  

I think of it as follows-

When divd is declared
Dr: RE 100 (FMV of bldg)
Cr: D/P 100

Property distributed as divd is appreciated to its FMV on declaration, so
Dr: Bldg 50
Cr: Gain on appreciation 50

When divd is paid
Dr: D/P 100
Cr: Bldg 100

So combined entry would be -
Dr: RE 100
Cr: Bldg 50
Cr: Gain 50

alternatively bldg of 50 can be written as
Bldg 70
AD (20)
= NBV 50
So the above entry becomes
Dr: RE 100
Dr: AD 20
Cr: Bldg 70
Cr: Gain 50

This is what I think, you might want to confirm.
Back to Top View amu7's Profile Search for other posts by amu7
 
1tryCPA
Major Contributor
Major Contributor


Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 337
Posted: 21 Jul 2010 at 12:31 | IP Logged  

I think Dividends payable account is not used.

We should use Property dividend distributable account - the same liability, but no D/P as no cash as Tajik4CPA said



__________________
FAR - 07/09/10 - {95}
AUD - 10/02/10 - {96}
BEC - 11/29/10 - {92}
REG - 05/23/11 - {75 would be enough}90 unbelievable, and I AM DONE!!!
______________
Wiley book/Gleim CD/Gleim simulations
Back to Top View 1tryCPA's Profile Search for other posts by 1tryCPA
 
CPASTONE
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 95
Posted: 21 Jul 2010 at 12:41 | IP Logged  

Thanks everyone for the help :)

__________________
CPASTONE
FAR- 7/30/10 -pass
Audit-05/26/10 -pass
Reg-05/21/10- pass
Bec-08/31/10-pass
Back to Top View CPASTONE's Profile Search for other posts by CPASTONE
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.0940 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote