Posted: 19 Apr 2011 at 15:40 | IP Logged
|
|
|
For calendar Year 1, Clark Corp. reported depreciation of $300k in its IS. On its Year 1 income tax retunr, Clark reported depr of $500k. Clark’s income statement also included $50k of accrued warranty exp that will be deducted for tax purposes when paid. Applicable eacted tax rates are 30% for Year 1 and Year 2, and 25$ for Year 3 and Year 4. The depreciation defference and warranty expense will reverse over the next 3 years as follows:
Depr Diff &n bsp; Warranty Exp
Year 2 80k &nb sp; 10k
Year 3 70k &nb sp; 15k
Year 4 50k &nb sp; 25k
These were Clark’s only temporary differences. In Clark’s Year 1 income statement, the deferred portion of its provision for income taxes should be?
The answer is $41K, and I don't understand why. They netted the two amounts against eachother and used the respective tax rates for each year. Why would they be netted against each other, and as I am typing this I know see why the one is a deferred asset and the other is a defered liab.
Okay my question just answered itself but i will still post this question because I think its a good one and I took the time to type it up.
__________________ FAR Passed
BEC Passed
AUD Passed
REG Passed
|