Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
FAR STUDY GROUP
 CPAnet Forum : FAR STUDY GROUP
Subject Topic: Interco elimination question (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
  
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
GVen
Contributor
Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 71
Posted: 25 Apr 2011 at 17:59 | IP Logged  

My question from the below is could you figure out the carrying amount of the inventory using your knowledge of what interco COGS was and what the inventory was? or do you have to build from A/R and interco Sales?

Question CPA-00464
Selected information from the separate and consolidated balance sheets and income statements of Pard, Inc. and its subsidiary, Spin Co., as of December 31, Year 1, and for the year then ended is as follows:

The three numbers are in the order of: Pard, Spin, Consolidated

Balance sheet accounts

Accounts receivable $ 26,000 $ 19,000 $ 39,000

Inventory 30,000 25,000 52,000

Investment in Spin 67,000 - -

Goodwill - - 30,000

Noncontrolling interest - - 10,000

Stockholders, equity 154,000 50,000 154,000

Pard Spin Consolidated

Income statement accounts

Revenues $200,000 $140,000 $308,000

Cost of goods sold 150,000 110,000 231,000

Gross profit 50,000 30,000 77,000

Equity in earnings of Spin 11,000 - -

Net income 36,000 20,000 40,000

Additional information: During Year 1, Pard sold goods to Spin at the same markup on cost that Pard uses for all

sales. At December 31, Year 1, Spin had not paid for all of these goods and still held 37.5% of them in inventory.

In Pard's consolidated balance sheet, what was the carrying amount of the inventory that Spin purchased from

Pard?

a. $3,000

b. $6,000

c. $9,000

d. $12,000

Explanation

Choice "c" is correct, $9,000. Pard has a gross profit percentage of 25% and a cost of goods sold percentage of

75%.

Intercompany revenues totaled $32,000:

Revenue - Pard $ 200,000

Revenue - Spin 140,000

Revenue before interco eliminations $ 340,000

- Consolidated revenue 308,000

Intercompany revenue $ 32,000

Therefore, intercompany cost of goods sold was $32,000 x 75% = $24,000 and the carrying amount of the

inventory purchased from Pard was $9,000 ($24,000 x 37.5%) on the consolidated balance sheet.

Back to Top View GVen's Profile Search for other posts by GVen
 
CPA10
Contributor
Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 18 Aug 2010
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Posted: 25 Apr 2011 at 19:37 | IP Logged  

The way I solved this was with the Inventory & GP ratio info.

Pard has:

Rev      200
COGS  (150)
____________
GP        50      =>GP Ratio = .25

Consolidated Inv is reduced by 3000. meaning that there was an elimination entry for the profit as well.

if the porfit was calculated to be 3000, then we can calculate the sale to have been 12000 (3000/.25).

therefore Inv CV = 9000 (Sale 12000 - Invent 9000 = 3000 Profit on intercompany sale that required elimination)



__________________
Back to Top View CPA10's Profile Search for other posts by CPA10
 
GVen
Contributor
Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 71
Posted: 27 Apr 2011 at 08:52 | IP Logged  

great straightforward explanation - your answer is much easier to understand and pulls together how i thought this should work.

thanks!!!

Back to Top View GVen's Profile Search for other posts by GVen
 
leslie4real
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Location: Bermuda
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 50
Posted: 04 Feb 2012 at 18:01 | IP Logged  

I spent a good 2 hours trying to understand this question, the Becker explanation didn't make sense, and the Wiley gave the 3000/.25 formula but did not really explain the reasoning behind it. 

Your post make sense and i finally understand. 

P.S. I don't usually spend that much time on a question, but this one really bugged me to the core.



__________________
AUD - 80
BEC - 80
REG - 65-62-82
FAR - May 18 2012
Back to Top View leslie4real's Profile Search for other posts by leslie4real
 
pass.or.die.try
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 30
Posted: 19 Feb 2012 at 19:45 | IP Logged  

thanks a million,,

A lot of the Becker explanations are sh!tttty. Apparently there are a few people that script the answers because some of the answers are really thorough and some have no explantions at all. And the section on intercompany transaction have no explanations as to how they come up with the answer, just add these numbers and subtract those numbers.. 

Back to Top View pass.or.die.try's Profile Search for other posts by pass.or.die.try
 




Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.1094 seconds.

Copyright © 1996-2016 CPAnet/MizWeb Communities All Rights Reserved
Twitter
|Facebook |CPA Exam Club | About | Contact | Newsletter | Advertise & Promote