Posted: 30 Oct 2009 at 14:41 | IP Logged
|
|
|
I just read some of the below threads, and I am in disbelief.
So let me get this straight. I applied for the exam back in August 2008, thinking all I had to do to become a CPA was pass. "Work experience certified by a CPA" was NOWHERE in the application materials.
I took REG in April 2009, passed with a 90. Took BEC in May 2009, passed with an 84. Took FAR on 10/26 and am taking AUD 11/30.
So now, all of a sudden, I CAN'T BE A CPA EVEN WHEN I PASS, because I haven't spent a full year directly working under a CPA willing to sign a certification???? ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME???
So, as the holder of a Master of Science in Accountancy, and having been employed as controller of a not-for-profit company for the past SEVEN AND A HALF YEARS, that's not good enough? I don't work under a CPA. Neither the CFO, CEO, nor COO are CPAs. Honestly, am I really expected to leave a perfectly good accounting job, to seek employment underneath a CPA for a year just so he/she can "certify" my work experience?
Seriously, what am I even doing here? Is this some kind of cruel joke? Is there any reason why I shouldn't just cancel my AUD date at Prometric and kill myself?
How can this be???
__________________ REG - 90
BEC - 84
FAR - 91
AUD - 91
|